Judicial Review on Administrative Action: Reflection on the Bank Century Bailout Policy

Lily Evelina Sitorus

Full Text: PDF



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n1.173

Abstract


Accountability is the key to good governance. In the global administrative law, every policy made should be accountable. The given law should be accessible for public. When global financial crisis happened, many countries didn't have the necessary rules to solve the problem arised. In Indonesia, the decision from government to bailout century bank is controversial as of right now. The need of comprehensive law in related to economic, political and social factor should be considered. The law of Administrative Governance of Indonesia (UU No 30/2014) had provided the code of conduct for government action. The placement of discretion in one whole chapter can be seen in two ways side-the restriction of government action and protection for public rights. In practice, the implementation of such rule is not accessible as the formulation intended. Harmonization with the law of Administrative Courts in Indonesia (UU No 5/1986 jo UU No 9/2004 jo UU 51/2009) is still needed.

Keywords


accountability; administrative law; bailout policy; judicial review; discretion

References


M.D.A. Freeman, “Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence”, Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd, London. 2001. Page. 523-524.

Sunarjati Hartono, “Apakah the Rule of Law itu?”, Penerbit Alumni, Bandung, 19 76, hal. 29.

Gerhard van der Schyff, “Judicial Review of Legislation A Comparative Study of United Kingdom, The Netherlands and South Africa”, Ius Gentium Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, Volume 5, Springer, 2010. Page. 1.

Tom Ginsburg, “Judicial Review in New Democracies Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases”, Cambridge University Press, 2003. Page. 12.

Simon Halliday, “Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law”, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2004. Page. 8

Li Li, “Judicial Dsicretion within Adjudicative Committee Proceedings in China A Bounded Rasionality Analysis”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. Page. 12.

Soehino, Hukum Tata Negara: Teknik Perundang-undangan dalam footnote ringkasan disertasi Daniel Yusmic No. 39.

Daniel Yusmic P Foekh, 2011. “Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang (PERPU) Suatu Kajian dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Normal dan Hukum Tata Negara Darurat”, Ringkasan Disertasi, tidak diterbitkan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Hal. 8.

Saifudin, 2006. “Proses Pembentukan Undang-undang Studi tentang Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Pembentukan UU di Era Reformasi”. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Hal. 530.

Zainal Arifin Hoesein, 2006. “Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan Menurut Konstitusi Indonesia, Studi tentang Perkembangan Pengaturan dan Pelaksanaannya oleh Mahkamah Agung RI dalam kurun waktu 1970-2003.” Disertasi tidak diterbitkan, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Hal. 455.

Pringgodigdo, R.M. Girindro. “Kebijaksanaan, Hirarkhi Perundang-Undangan dan Kebijakan dalam konteks Pengembangan Hukum Administrasi Negara di Indonesia”, Pidato Pengukuhan diucapkan pada penerimaan jabatan sebagai Guru Besar Tetap Ilmu Hukum pada FHUI di Balai Sidang UI, Rabu 16 November 1994.

Buku putih Upaya Pemerintah dalam Pencegahan dan Penanganan Krisis, Departemen Keuangan RI, Januari 2010. Hal. 2.

Delfina Gusman, Problematika dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, 10 April 2013 diunduh dari: http://fhuk.unand.ac.id/in/kerjasama-hukum/menuartikeldosen-category/927--problematika-dalam-pembentukan-peraturan-perundang-undangan-article.html

Arif Christiono Soebroto, Arif Christiono. Kedudukan Hukum Peraturan/Kebijakan Dibawah Peraturan

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum Tata Negara Darurat, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.

Thio Li-ann, The Theory and Practice of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Singapore, SAL Conference 2011 — Singapore Law Developments (2006–2010).

Hilaire Barnett, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Routledge and Cavendish, 2006. Hal. 750.

Laica Marzuki dalam Zainal Arifin Hoesein, “Judicial Review di Mahkamah Agung RI Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan” PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2009. Hal. viii.

Keith Hawkins, The Use of Legal Discretion: Perspectives from Law and Social Science dalam Oxford Socio-Legal Studies ‘The Uses of Discretion’, Oxford University Press, 1992, op. cit. Hal. 14.

Kenneth Culp Davis, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, University of Illinois Press, 1971. Hal. v.

Charles H. Koch Jr. Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion, William & Mary Law School, 1986.




ISSN: 2356-2129